The Resurrection: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Resurrection of Jesus

You looking to find the "The Resurrection: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Resurrection of Jesus" Good news! You can purchase The Resurrection: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Resurrection of Jesus with secure price and compare to view update price on this product. And deals on this product is available only for limited time.

   

Product Description

This collection of papers is an international, ecumenical, and interdisciplinary study of Jesus' resurrection that emerged from the `Resurrection Summit' meeting held in New York at Easter 1996. The contributions represent mainstream scholarship on biblical studies, fundamental theology, systematic theology, philosophy, moral theology, and homiletics, and combine to offer a timely, wide-ranging, and well-balanced work on the central truth of Christianity.

The Resurrection: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Resurrection of Jesus Review

A collection of essays contributed by participants in a "Resurrection Summit" that was held in New York, Easter 1996. The contributors are top scholars with reputations for their work on the topic of resurrection. Many of the essays include thoughtful responses from other scholars. These responses are sometimes critical and sometimes complimentary. I enjoyed reading thoughtful evaluations of the thoughtful arguments that I had just finished reading.

Space precludes a review of every chapter, but I will discuss some of the ones I found most interesting. In Chapter 2, O'Collins helpfully provides an overview of the scholarly debate on various issues related to the resurrection, such as what the early Christians meant by the proclamation of the resurrection, the nature of the resurrection appearances, the empty tomb, and the nature of "Easter faith." O'Collins does a good job of summarizing the positions of various scholars and, often, providing quick responses to their claims. He is particularly effective in reducing the arguments by some scholars that the early Christians meant by their resurrection proclamation about Jesus something other than that Jesus had been raised from the dead (such as they were simply saying they believed in the continuing sense of empowerment Jesus brought them). He also discusses reaction to his theory that the resurrection appearances, though very real, were a "graced seeing" that would not have been visible to those that were not granted eyes to see; as well as reducing the theory that the resurrection appearances were in fact something akin to near-death experiences. Thereafter, O'Collins spends some time refuting Yarbro Collins' argument that the empty tomb narrative in the Gospel of Mark is not meant to be literal but is only a vivid way of describing the early Christian proclamation of resurrection. The rest of the chapter moves along just as briskly and is worth the effort. O'Collins educates his readers as to a diversity of theories, some far-fetched, while also providing persuasive critiques.

Stephen Davis in Chapter 6 explores three different explanations for the resurrection appearances. First, that they were seen by "normal vision," by which he means that what they saw was really there disturbing and reflecting photons of life. Second, that they were the result of "subjective vision," by which he means that what they saw was not really there and was merely the product of their own minds. Third, and perhaps the one least familiar to readers, is that they were result of "objective vision," by which mean means that what they saw was really there but visible only to those to whom God had granted eyes to see. This is the position of O'Collins referenced above. In my opinion, Davis persuasively argues that what is described in the New Testament was seen by "normal vision" and then considers the implications of that conclusion.

Finally, in Chapter 7, William Alston explores the question, "What can we learn from the Gospels about what really happened on and just after the first easter?" Alston takes direct aim at and makes persuasive points against another book, The Formation of the Resurrection Narratives. Philosopher Richard Swinburne makes his case for the resurrection in Chapter 8 and William L. Craig takes on John D. Crossan's views of the resurrection in Chapter 10.

This book would be a valuable addition to anyone's library on the resurrection. But it is especially helpful if you are just getting your feet wet, as it gives you access to the theories and arguments of many leaders in the field.

Most of the consumer Reviews tell that the "The Resurrection: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Resurrection of Jesus" are high quality item. You can read each testimony from consumers to find out cons and pros from The Resurrection: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Resurrection of Jesus ...